Happy Fossil Friday!
Friday October 16, 2020
Instructor: Arthur Reed, P.G.
Seafloor
Fossils on the Summit of Mt. Everest?
Earth
is Dynamic!
The
summit of Mount Everest, the highest point on Earth, is an ancient sea
floor. It is limestone with fossils of trilobites, crinoids, brachiopods,
ostracods, and others...all life from an ancient ocean floor. The rocks
at the top of Mt. Everest (where climbers spend a fortune to stand) formed from
sediment on the floor of the ancient Tethys Sea (or possibly a pre-Tethys Sea)
in the range of 450 million years ago. Its floor was pushed up into the
Himalaya Mountains by India colliding with Asia in the process of plate
tectonics starting around 55 million years ago.
See Full Article Below
Fossils of Mount Everest
The summit of Mount Everest, the highest point on Earth, is a sea floor.
That may come as a surprise; after all, a sea should be at sea level. In
practice, there is some flexibility on this. Three seas are below sea level: the Dead Sea, the Salton Sea and the Caspian Sea. All are salt water lakes which carry the name sea. There is a fourth
one, the Aral Sea, which is above sea level. Its water surface (at least what
remains of it, after one of the biggest environmental disasters of the 20th century)
is currently 42 meters above sea level, and it can therefore claim to be the
highest salt-water sea on Earth. It is still some way off Everest though. There
is one fresh water lake which is called a ‘sea’: the
Sea of Galilee, but it is also below sea level. Lake Baikal is called ‘sea’ by the locals, but not
in its official name – if it did, it would have been the highest sea on Earth,
at 455 meters. The highest fresh-water lake on Earth is reported to be the
crater lake of the Argentinian volcano Ojos del Salados
which is at 6930 meters. However, it is rather small, at 35 meters, and by definition should be called a pond rather than a lake.
Cerro Tipas Lake at 5950 meters is the next best
candidate. There are some higher bodies of water in the Himalayas
but they are ephemeral. But every single one of them is topped by the summit of
Everest. It is perhaps a bit sobering to think that people who sacrifice their
fortune and potentially their lives in order to climb
Mount Everest, end up standing on a sea floor.
A sea floor should be
lower than the sea it floors. Clearly, things have happened here that turned a
sea floor into the roof of the world. The story behind this involves the
highest fossil hunting on the planet, and not one but two lost oceans. It shows
how trilobites managed to beat Nepal’s famous Sherpas, by hitching a ride with
a carrier, becoming cargo to the mountain itself.
The presence of marine
fossils near the summit of Mount Everest has entered the domain of common
knowledge. Many posts, articles, and newspapers state that sea
shells are found at the summit. But few give the source of their
information – it is just something that ‘everyone knows’. And there is
confusion about the fossils of Mount Everest. Shells are commonly mentioned, of
varying sizes. A few sites mention ammonites, and I even found one that claimed
the presence of fish. Try to find the source of their information and you
quickly hit blanks and dead links. Who did the fossil collecting? Most people
climbing Mount Everest do not go there to hunt for fossils. Their goal is to
reach the summit – not to bring down the mountain. On the way up, you don’t want to carry rocks with you. On the way down, your
main aim is staying alive, while frozen and oxygen-deprived.
Where are the fossils of Mount Everest? And what are those fossils?
Facts
First, let’s clear up some confusion. How did a
mountain shared between Tibet and Nepal end up with an English name? You can
blame the Royal Geographical Society for that. This was the age of the
exploration, and what is the point of exploring if you can’t
give names? Marquez’ master piece, One hundred years of solitude, describes when the world was so recent that
many things lacked names, and in order to indicate them it was necessary to
point. This was not the British way. Names were needed. Mount Everest
had not been noticed at first as being particularly impressive. The exploring
had to be done from a considerable distance, from Tibet, as the explorers were
not allowed entry into Nepal. Foreshortening meant that other peaks appeared
taller. In the 1840’s, the first indications appeared that a distant peak could
be taller than any other. For a while it was called ‘peak b’, and later it
became ‘peak XV’, but that wouldn’t do. When no local
name could be identified, it was finally named after George Everest, Surveyor
General of India. The pronunciation evolved, with the long ‘e’ becoming a short
one, but otherwise the name stuck. The new pronunciation had a ring to it: it
sounded like a special place.
However, unbeknown to
the explorers, a Tibetan name was already in existence. It was Qomolangma, and that name is now often used. Nepal has
since adopted yet a different name, Sagar-Matha. Pick
your choice: whichever name you use, at least you no longer have
to point.
And what about the
height? Nepal and China, who share the summit, quote different numbers for it.
Nepal uses the traditional 8848 meters. China claims it is only 8844 meters.
The first number refers to the actual altitude climbers reach when standing
(very briefly – there is a queue) at the summit. They are standing on 3-4
meters of snow. The second number gives the rock height which is a more stable
way to measure a mountain – but it isn’t as high so it
didn’t catch on. People who climbed the mountain from the Tibetan side would
find their achievement listed as 4 meters less than those climbing the same
mountain from Nepal. When spending a fortune, such details matter.
The 1924 Everest expedition. Back row, left to right: Andrew
Irvine, George Mallory, Edward Norton, Noel Odell, and John Macdonald. Front
row: Edward Shebbeare, Geoffrey Bruce, Howard
Somervell, and Bentley Beetham.
But regardless of the name and the height, Mount Everest is a very dangerous mountain. The sheer number of people
climbing it in the brief annual climbing season does not help. But the
statistics of the mountain are sobering. For the Sherpas, the fatality rate is
between 1% and 4% per year. Avalanches during the
pre-season preparations are especially deadly. Almost 300 people have died on
Mount Everest since 1950. Among them is the NASA astronaut and astronomer Karl Henize – but many other names could be mentioned. George
Mallory, who disappeared near the summit together with Irvine in 1924, was born
very near to where I now live. The chase of Everest
connects the world.
The layers of Everest
The triangular mountain is instantly recognizable. If you haven’t studied
the shape in detail, try this gigapixel view. But it is easy to miss the detail in
the mountain. There are several layers. For instance, there is a region with
inclined layered bedding, a bit below the summit, clearly visible at the bottom
of the summit pyramid.
The second most famous pyramid in the world
The structure of the
mountain is a bit hidden behind the snow. Sweep the snow away, and four main
layers appear. The same layers are also visible in the other mountains in the
area.
Source: http://www.earthsciences.hku.hk/shmuseum/earth_evo_08_2.5.2.5.php RF:
Rungbok formation; ES: Everest Series; YB: Yellow
Band; OF: Qomolonga Formation (Everest limestones)
The layers are colour-coded in the drawing shown here. The bottom layer is
colour-coded in brown, and
labelled ‘LG+RF’. ‘RF’ stands for Rungbok Formation
and ‘LG’ is a granite. RF is a gneiss: rock partly melted and metamorphosed
under high temperatures (up to 500 C) and pressure, deep below the mountain.
The granite was molten crustal rock from below which pushed its way up into
this layer, much like granite complexes have done at the heart of every
mountain chain. A low-angle (almost horizontal) fault separates the layer from
the one above, which is colour-coded in green. This
layer is called the Everest Series (ES), and it consists of sedimentary rock which
has been metamorphosed at reasonably high temperatures. Above this, in yellow,
is the so-called ‘Yellow Band’. This is the layered bedding which was mentioned
before. It is a limestone, formed from a shallow marine sediment, heated to
become a marble. Above this is another near-horizontal fault, and above this is
an almost unmetamorphosed layer of limestone here called ‘QF’ for Qomolangma Formation, which forms the summit of Everest.
The layers have moved around: the two faults are planes along which the layers
have been sliding into their current position. The upper layers didn’t form exactly here, nor did they form in the same
place. They are short-distance migrants.
Look at nearby
mountains, and the same layers may be seen in the same order, although not at
the same altitude. From south to north, the layers decline in altitude. The
mountain building that pushed them up in the first place, caused by crustal
thickening and intrusion of the granite, was strongest around Mount Everest but
less severe further north. The fact that the layers don’t
invert shows that in this location, the sliding was a simple process. There was
no turn-over of layers as happened elsewhere, and as is seen in the Alps or
Caledonian mountains. Around Everest, the upper sediment that has been least
metamorphosed is always at the top. But few mountains are high enough to reach
them: in most cases, erosion has removed this layer completely. There are nine
mountains over 8 kilometer high in the high Himalayas.
Of those, 6 still have a sedimentary layer at the top.
The Tethys Ocean
The top layers of Mount
Everest are made from a marine sediment: a sea floor. But which sea? Or rather,
which ocean? To answer this, we need to go back to the heady days when the
Himalayas formed.
The Himalayas were a long-delayed consequence of the break-up of
Gondwana. Australia, Africa, South America, India and
Antarctica were all together in this supercontinent. (The world rugby
competition between Gondwana and its northern-hemisphere counterpart,
Laurussia, must have been a very one-sided affair!) Gondwana began to break up
along the east coast of Africa where a fault grew into the
Indian Ocean. In the process, a fragment was split off and became adrift in
this new ocean. The fragment split further, into Madagascar and India.
Madagascar stayed behind, but the fault behind India rapidly widened into an
ocean and India was pushed forward, north. Between India and Asia was the
Tethys: a worldwide, equatorial ocean running from China to Central America.
So
India went across, closing the Tethys in the process and forming the Indian
Ocean behind it. The seafloor that was uplifted and shifted to Everest was from
the Tethys. It wasn’t the deep ocean basin: that was
mostly subducted. The mountains grew from the continental shelf,
and pushed up the sediment that was lying on it. The Tethys just
disappeared. A few scars remain which trace the lost ocean. Some have already
been mentioned: the Black Sea, the Caspian Sea and
even the Aral Sea trace out the line where the ocean once was.
This is the basic view,
In reality, things were a bit more complicated. I’ll come back to that.
Collision
50 million years ago
India completed the crossing, failed to stop, and crashed into Asia. The
collision happened in two phases. First, India hit an island chain. This was a
volcanic island arc that had grown out of the subduction zone. The island arc
left its sign in northern Pakistan. Later, India hit Asia, beginning in the northwest and ending in the northeast, in a drawn-out
process. Originally, India had moved at break-neck speed, covering the distance
at up to 20 cm per year. By the time of the initial collision, India had slowed
down to 5 cm per year. This was still well above the speed limit for safe
continental docking, though. The continental plate of India slid underneath Asia, and crumpled. The Himalayas are the crumple zone of
that collision. The granite that forms the heart of the Himalayas consists of
the Indian plate, melted at the high pressures at the bottom of a crust
thickened to 70 kilometers.
The collision left
India a lot smaller than it used to be. At 5 cm per year, India has lost 1000
kilometers over 20 million years. And still it is moving. It is hard to stop a
continent.
So
the Himalayas grew from below. In the process they pushed up the layer of
seafloor sediment. Once the new mountains pulled in the rains, erosion attacked
them. It removed the material from the top. In consequence, very little of the
old seafloor that formed the upper reaches remains:
only those 6 of the highest peaks just reach the Tibetan marine deposits. The
rest of the old sea floor has been carried away by the giant rivers of the Himalayas, and returned to the Indian Ocean.
Fossils
The ancient sea floor will have incorporated the organic remains of
ocean life. Fossils are relatively fragile: they can survive a modest amount of
heating of the rock, although it may push then out of shape. But there are
limits. You expect fossils in sedimentary rocks and in mildly processed
metamorphic rock. By the time the rock becomes greenschist, any fossils will be gone.
A schist from high up on Mount Everest. Source: https://palaeomanchester.wordpress.com/2017/12/14/reaching-new-heights-with-collecting-everest-specimen/ It
was collected at around 8 km altitude and that is impressive enough. But it is
a schist and as such contains no fossils.
The lower layers of
Everest are indeed greenschist, and are not great for
fossils. The granite was injected from below and has been through worse: no
fossils here. The Yellow Band is a marble, heated enough that only microscopic
fossils may be left. The upper-most layer is limestone and although it has seen
elevated temperatures and pressures, it remains suitable for fossils – if you don’t expect too much! It is found above 8600 meters.
The most interesting
fossil rock of Everest will therefore be those nearest the summit. But they are
also the hardest to get hold off. You can’t just jump
on a plane to go collect an Everest summit rock! Luckily, we don’t
entirely depend on the mountain itself: because the layers tilt downward
towards the north, the same (or similar) rocks can be collected at slightly
more reasonable altitudes. The Rongbuk Glacier in
Tibet is such a place, and a lower layer is named after this location. But in
the end, the fossil scientists wanted rocks from the mountain itself.
The first rocks from
the upper layers were collected already in 1922, at an altitude of 8200 meters.
More were collected in 1924, on the very day (and the same expedition) that
Mallory and Irvine disappeared into the clouds. There were more samples collected
over the next years, but many were stolen in 1939 and the notes describing them
destroyed two years later. Expeditions of various nationalities brought back
new rocks over the next decades.
The limestone is light in colour. It
consists of layers of bedding, as narrow as a few millimetres,
with alternating sand and calcareous (chalk) bands. The bands have colours varying from white to dark grey. The sand seems to
have come from eroded granite: it was an erosion product from the land, brought
down by rivers and collected in sand banks. It comes from mountains that came
before the Himalayas, but how much earlier is impossible to tell.
Both the sand and the chalk contain fossils, tiny but clear.
‘Tiny’ here means that you need a microscope to see them: the sizes are
something like a millimetre. It is quite a contrast
with the size of the mountain!
Here are two examples, from the
work of Professor Ganser, Geology of the Himalayas (1964) and reproduced by
Noel Odell in 1974, in the Geological Magazine. (Click on each image to see the
full resolution.) Odell was one of the original members of the 1924 Everest
expedition. Both examples show fragments of crinoids. Crinoids are better known
as sea lilies; their relatives include starfish and sea urchins. Sea lilies
have been around since the Cambrian. Nowadays, they are found in deeper water,
below 200 meters, but in the deep past they lived in shallow waters,
and formed complete forests. Limestone beds can be made up entirely of
such creatures: they were that abundant.
A sea lily, from the Gulf of Mexico. Organisms related to this
one were abundant in the sediments that became the
summit of Mount Everest. Photo: NOAA
Material from the Yellow Band has
shown that it too contains up to 5% crinoid fragments. Other fossil fragments
were found in the limestone: trilobites, brachiopods (lamp shells), and
ostracods (small shrimps). Below about 70 meters below the summit there is a
layer that formed from trapped sediment, 60 meters thick. The sediment was
caught in a biofilm, probably from cyanobacteria (algae). This kind of
bacterial mat is called a thrombolite, and forms in very shallow marine water.
The thrombolite bed forms the bottom of the summit pyramid, including the ‘third step’.
The highest rocks that have been
brought down were collected from 6 meters below the summit! They were collected
in 1997 by a Japanese climber, M. Sawada; the analysis was published by Harutaka Sakai and collaborators.
Two images from their work with fossil fragments are shown here.
The left image shows a polished slab of the summit limestone.
The bar at the bottom is 1 centimeter. It shows bedding and faulting; fractures
are filled with calcite. On the right is an enlarged polished surface showing
crinoid and brachiopod fragments; the bar is 1 mm.
Left: grainstone with skeletal grains
of trilobite (T), crinoid (C), ostracod (O) and fecal pellets (P). The bar is
1mm. Right: T trilobite fragments with the typical threefold arched shape. The
bar is 0.1mm.
The Tethys and
what really happened
How old are those fossil fragments? You might expect it to have
the age of the formation of the Himalayas: some 40 million years. But no. The
fossils are Ordovician to middle Cambrian, around 520 to 450 million years old.
These dates have been confirmed by analysis of zircon grains of the Yellow
Band. The sea floor, or rather the continental shelf, that became the summit of
Everest was ancient! It was much older than the mountains themselves. The
sediment had been on the sea floor for a very long
time, before India came and scooped it up.
There is something funny here. The Tethys Ocean first formed
around 275 million years ago. That makes the ocean considerably younger than
the age of the fossils. Mount Everest couldn’t have
come from the Tethys! The fossils lived when the ocean wasn’t
there yet. The typical life time of an ocean is 200
million years: by that time, the oceanic crust has cooled so far that it
becomes denser than the mantle below, and it begins to sink. A subduction zone
forms which swallows the ageing ocean. The difference in age between the
fossils and the Tethys correspond to this age. Mount Everest grew out of the
previous generation of ocean.
Indeed, before the Tethys formed,
there had been another ocean. Nowadays it is called the Paleo-Tethys. In those
days, of course, the world was so recent that many things lacked names, and in order to indicate them it was necessary to point. Originally,
Gondwana and Laurussia were separated by this Paleo-Tethys.
Around 290 million years ago, a fault developed in Gondwana. It
became a spreading ridge and experienced intensive flood basalt eruptions. The
area to the north of the spreading centre split off
from Gondwana. It was a fairly thin, long fragment,
consisting of Turkey, Iran, and Tibet. Behind them, the spreading ridge quickly
became an ocean: this is what became the Tethys (sometimes called the
Neo-Tethys). The flood basalt was carried with: the
remnants can be found as the Panjal Traps in Kashmir.
The cause of this early split of Gondwana is disputed. There is no strong
evidence for a mantle plume. It may have been an older, passive fault which
became activated when the old Paleo-Tethys began to subduct,
and started to pull on Gondwana.
The fragment that included Tibet moved towards Asia, in the
process closing the Paleo-Tethys ocean in front and opening the Tethys ocean
behind it. 200 million years later, the process replayed itself. Again a subduction zone had formed as the Tethys was
reaching the end of its life. Again Gondwana spit,
this time terminally. India declared independence and started its journey
towards Asia, chasing after Tibet.
The collision now occurred in stages. First, the remnants of the
Tethys were swept up as the fragment of Tibet was driven into Asia. This formed
the first mountain range, the Trans-Himalayas, around 55 million years. The
range is still there: it lies north of the high Himalayas, starting from Kasmir. It runs parallel to it for over 1500 kilometers,
with peaks over 7 kilometers high. The range lacks the clear structure of the river
valleys of the high Himalayas. This is because it formed first, before the
rivers were there. The rivers began to flow from the range, including the
Indus. Immediately to the south, the Tethys-Himalayas were also uplifted. This
included the old sea floor. The process here was gentle, with little
metamorphism.
Next, India arrived. This collision threw up the High Himalayas,
south of the Tethyan range. The Indus and Brahmaputra rivers were already
there, flowing from the Trans-Himalayas and through the Tethys-Himalayas. Both
cut through the newly rising mountains: you can see that they originate behind
the high mountains, showing that they predate it. The rising was a prolonged
process. The current high Himalayas were build
on granite emplaced around 20 million years ago. The rising of the high
Himalayas continued in phases, and is still on-going.
India isn’t finished yet.
Source: wikipedia
The progressions of oceans is still
seen in the Himalayas. The shore of old Laurussia became the Trans Himalayans.
The continental shelf of the Paleo-Tethys was uplifted to form the
Tethys-Himalayas. The new shore line facing the Tethys
ocean became the High Himalayas, underplated by the Indian subcontinent.
So how did the Paleo-Tethys sediments end up on Everest? You may
blame the near-horizontal fault that runs between the limestone of the Qomolonga Formation and the Yellow Band. It provided a
low-friction contact. As the Trans Himalays rose up, the limestone layer slid down, towards the south.
When the High Himalayas formed, the old Paleo-Tethys floor was ready and waiting.
The mountains formed underneath it, sediment from an ocean that had vanished in
the earlier collision.
Raising the
roof
When you climb Mount Everest, you are not just reaching the
summit of Earth. It is also a journey back in time. The mountain is young, as
mountains go: the granite at its heart is no more than 24 million years old.
One day, erosion will have taken it down to the level of this granite. But not
yet. For now, remnants remain of the older surface that was here before the
mountain grew up. The fossils, microscopic and broken down they may be, show
that this surface is old as the mountains, by manner of speaking. They date
back to the Cambrian. The Indian Ocean is the grand child of the ocean in which
they lived. The fossils survived not one but two continental collisions.
The summit of Mount Everest is so much older than the mountain
itself. It was deposited when even Gondwana was young. Climbing Mount Everest
takes you to a time when life was young and many
things lacked names. Even if the fossils are only a millimetre
across – it is worth bringing some down, back to the sea where once they came
from.
Albert Zijlstra, June 2018
